- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 13:19:25 -0700
- To: chairs@w3.org, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, W3C WAI Protocols & Formats <w3c-wai-pf@w3.org>
Responding to Janina's message forwarding the WAI-PF WG's comments on
the CSSWG's CR transition request for CSS Flexible Box Layout:
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2012JulSep/0049.html
Threading is broken because I'm not a member of chairs@ :)
Hi Janina, WAI-PF,
Daniel Glazman forwarded your comments to us, and I have attempted
to address them as you requested.
With regards to the note about accessibility impact:
I've added a note to the top of the Ordering and Orientation section,
as you suggested. I also added an authoring conformance requirement
that the reordering capabilities of Flexbox not be used as a substitute
for correct source ordering. You can find the text in the editor's draft,
here:
http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-flexbox/#ordering-and-orientation
There is also some relevant prose and conformance requirements in the
section defining 'order', for which we have recently added a heading
and an anchor:
http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-flexbox/#order-accessibility
With regards to tab navigation:
We discussed this issue back in June:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jun/0478.html
with the participation of John Foliot:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jun/0481.html
The conclusion was that following the source order and following
the visual order both have use cases. We resolved that by default,
the tab order should follow the source order. This keeps it
consistent with the speech order and with other layout models,
in which there is not such an obvious concept of "flow" as there
is in Flexbox. We added advice to authors that the source order
should remain logical for this and other reasons.
We will, however, investigate providing some kind of switch in the
future. The CSS Working Group agrees this is an area that needs
further development, and there are other issues with tab navigation
that also need work. We expect to take these up together the next
time we visit tab navigation, in the UI module.
http://wiki.csswg.org/ideas/nav-index
Please let us know if this addresses your concerns.
~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 8 August 2012 20:19:55 UTC