- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 13:19:25 -0700
- To: chairs@w3.org, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, W3C WAI Protocols & Formats <w3c-wai-pf@w3.org>
Responding to Janina's message forwarding the WAI-PF WG's comments on the CSSWG's CR transition request for CSS Flexible Box Layout: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2012JulSep/0049.html Threading is broken because I'm not a member of chairs@ :) Hi Janina, WAI-PF, Daniel Glazman forwarded your comments to us, and I have attempted to address them as you requested. With regards to the note about accessibility impact: I've added a note to the top of the Ordering and Orientation section, as you suggested. I also added an authoring conformance requirement that the reordering capabilities of Flexbox not be used as a substitute for correct source ordering. You can find the text in the editor's draft, here: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-flexbox/#ordering-and-orientation There is also some relevant prose and conformance requirements in the section defining 'order', for which we have recently added a heading and an anchor: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-flexbox/#order-accessibility With regards to tab navigation: We discussed this issue back in June: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jun/0478.html with the participation of John Foliot: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jun/0481.html The conclusion was that following the source order and following the visual order both have use cases. We resolved that by default, the tab order should follow the source order. This keeps it consistent with the speech order and with other layout models, in which there is not such an obvious concept of "flow" as there is in Flexbox. We added advice to authors that the source order should remain logical for this and other reasons. We will, however, investigate providing some kind of switch in the future. The CSS Working Group agrees this is an area that needs further development, and there are other issues with tab navigation that also need work. We expect to take these up together the next time we visit tab navigation, in the UI module. http://wiki.csswg.org/ideas/nav-index Please let us know if this addresses your concerns. ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 8 August 2012 20:19:55 UTC