- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 20:53:18 +0000
- To: "Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu" <kennyluck@csail.mit.edu>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, "Edward O'Connor (eoconnor@apple.com)" <eoconnor@apple.com>, "Simon Fraser (smfr@me.com)" <smfr@me.com>, "Dean Jackson (dino@apple.com)" <dino@apple.com>
[Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu:]
>
> (12/08/04 6:15), Sylvain Galineau wrote:
> > Looking into this open issue [1], I find that both Firefox (Aurora)
> > and IE10 ignore keyframe selectors that are <0% or >100% and simply
> > run the animation as if they weren't present.
> >
> > WebKit (Chrome 21) seems to ignore the entire animation of any
> > keyframe selector is out of bounds.
> >
> > (I have no build of Opera that supports css3-animations at the moment).
>
> For your information, Opera Next (Opera 12.50 internal) behaves like
> Firefox and IE10 here.
>
> (tested with
>
> data:text/html,<!DOCTYPE html><style>@-o-keyframes test { -10% { top:
> 0em; } 0% { top: 1em; } 100% {top: 10em;} 110% {top: 20em; } } div {
> border: red solid; position: absolute; -o-animation: test 1s
> infinite;}</style><div></div>
> )
>
> > I propose we specify the behavior implemented by Firefox and IE; it
> > seems more consistent with author expectations of what would happen to
> an invalid selector.
>
> Yeah.
>
Thank you!
Ted, Simon, Dean and other Apple folk: any comments and/or objections?
Received on Monday, 6 August 2012 20:53:50 UTC