On Monday 2012-08-06 09:11 -0700, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 12:16 AM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > > I'm inclined to agree with Cameron's original suggestion that > > comments be preserved, because I don't see any other option that > > preserves arbitrary syntax so that it can be re-parsed to get the > > same result. > > I think my suggestion above satisfies this requirement. I don't see how it helps. In particular, I think it would probably be a good idea if serialization rules we came up with for variables or @supports were able to handle some of the contents being selectors rather than property values -- and to do so correctly without knowing whether the contents were selectors or property values. Otherwise I worry we'd have trouble extending these concepts to cover selectors if we wanted to do so in the future. -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂Received on Monday, 6 August 2012 16:47:54 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:19 UTC