- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 15:57:07 -0700
- To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com> wrote: > Looking into this open issue [1], I find that both Firefox (Aurora) and IE10 > ignore keyframe selectors that are <0% or >100% and simply run the animation > as if they weren't present. > > WebKit (Chrome 21) seems to ignore the entire animation of any keyframe selector > is out of bounds. > > (I have no build of Opera that supports css3-animations at the moment). > > I propose we specify the behavior implemented by Firefox and IE; it seems more > consistent with author expectations of what would happen to an invalid selector. > > [1] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14795 Agreed. (Though it would have been nice, if this weren't constrained by existing impls, to have it work similarly to, say, radial gradients stops positioned less than 0%, where the keyframe is still used to generate a "virtual" 0% keyframe. But we're past that point now.) ~TJ
Received on Friday, 3 August 2012 22:57:55 UTC