W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2012

Re: [css4-images] element() behavior

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 21:54:11 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDAJ4etb-HJmrZyKdcqs5tWN6Q8eY3CCcKMW-X=h3RbUaw@mail.gmail.com>
To: robert@ocallahan.org
Cc: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
>> As written today, filters from ancestors are honored.  It may be
>> better to change this, and ignore filters from ancestors, just like we
>> ignore transforms from ancestors.
> I think it's essential that all effects on ancestors (e.g. transforms,
> clipping, opacity, filters, masking) be ignored. Having some effects and not
> others be applied would be confusing and also very difficult to implement.

Okay.  Do we have a good definition of "effects", or is it just
something we have to decide case-by-case?

Received on Wednesday, 1 August 2012 04:55:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:19 UTC