- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 00:47:48 +0000
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
[Tab Atkins Jr.:] > > On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 3:05 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> > wrote: > > 1. I object to any layout spec going to LC without dbaron having > > reviewed > > and signed off on each aspect of it. That's just asking for trouble. > > I think last time we talked about this, dbaron said he deferred to > dholbert on this, and Daniel seems to be okay with the spec, as far as I > can tell. > > > 2. There are still some pretty significant open issues, including > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0743.html > > Is there any reason you expect resolving that to take longer than the 6- > week LC period (I expect to resolve it before the end of this week). > Note that this is a minor issue, as it's solely a renaming, even if it > has a somewhat larger effect over CSS as a whole (in the precedent it > establishes for alignment properties). > > The other currently-open issues are similarly small. > I agree that we should be able to enter LC when our expectation of resolving the remaining known issues during LC is reasonable. If we agree there is less than 6 weeks of work left and the rate of incoming issues is near-zero then we should err on the side of moving forward. That is easiest to agree on given a complete list of open issues; I don't see fantasai's on the wiki page though?
Received on Tuesday, 17 April 2012 00:48:21 UTC