- From: Florian Rivoal <florianr@opera.com>
- Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2012 00:59:06 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 22:44:43 +0200, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com> wrote: >> On 29/03/2012, at 12:08 PM, fantasai wrote: >> >> > The initial value of animation-direction is 'normal'. To be consistent >> > with 'marquee-direction' (and also to be clearer in contrast with >> > 'reverse'), I suggest renaming it to 'forward'. > Animations are implemented across 4 browsers and sees sufficient use that > the WG wants to push the spec along the standard track. (We even > discussed > whether to unprefix at LC not long ago) Renaming this value does not seem > helpful in such a context. There is a point beyond which making changes > for > the sake of naming consistency become more expensive than they're worth. > I > think we have been past that point for some time now. > > We added two values to this property last week to round out its behavior. > I'd like to leave it alone unless there is compelling evidence that there > is an issue that needs fixing. I am in total agreement with Sylvain here. - Florian
Received on Friday, 6 April 2012 22:54:45 UTC