- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 16:22:43 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 4:17 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > On 04/03/2012 10:11 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> I also agree with 'none', though not quite how you phrase it - I think >> all list-valued properties should have a value that means "do >> nothing". Many of them already use 'none' for precisely that value, >> which is fine, but we can go ahead and make it global. > > I don't think it's helpful to make it global. Then we have to distinguish > between list and non-list properties, and there are other non-list > properties > that take the value 'none'... etc. It's more like auto and normal -- > commonly > used keywords that mean different things depending on their context. And I > think it's better to just leave that up to individual properties to specify. After further thinking, I agree. We should be vigilant about ensuring that list-valued properties all accept it, but I don't know how to specify a meaning for it for non-list-valued properties. The meaning we want here only works for properties that are purely additive. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 5 April 2012 23:23:32 UTC