- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 16:17:11 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 04/03/2012 10:11 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > > I also agree with 'none', though not quite how you phrase it - I think > all list-valued properties should have a value that means "do > nothing". Many of them already use 'none' for precisely that value, > which is fine, but we can go ahead and make it global. I don't think it's helpful to make it global. Then we have to distinguish between list and non-list properties, and there are other non-list properties that take the value 'none'... etc. It's more like auto and normal -- commonly used keywords that mean different things depending on their context. And I think it's better to just leave that up to individual properties to specify. ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 5 April 2012 23:17:39 UTC