W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2012

Re: [CSS21] Resolution to Bug 16049 (margin collapsing) [Was: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions Telecon 2012-04-04]

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 17:23:51 -0700
Message-ID: <4F7CE617.3020408@inkedblade.net>
To: www-style@w3.org
On 04/04/2012 03:45 PM, Anton Prowse wrote:
>> fantasai: could be "for example, margin collapsing is not affected because
>> [it is] based on computed values and not used values"
>> glazou: is fantasai's proposal a compromise you can live with?
>> arronei: I think that what fantasai proposes is fine, with 'for example'
>> prefix. May need some rewording.
>> * fantasai wonders if dbaron is on the call
>> RESOLVED: replace the sentence with Fantasai's proposal
> Did we resolve that? I thought that we resolved to do something /similar/ to that (that is, use "For example, margin
> collapsing is unaffected because [...]") but with a view to possible rewording the second half of fantasai's proposal, as per
> Arron's comment.
> At least, I'd like to mull the full sentence over for a short while before committing to it.

I believe we did resolve on that, but would be open to editorial tweaking.

Received on Thursday, 5 April 2012 00:24:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:14 UTC