W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2012

[CSS21] Resolution to Bug 16049 (margin collapsing) [Was: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions Telecon 2012-04-04]

From: Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 00:45:56 +0200
Message-ID: <4F7CCF24.8010501@moonhenge.net>
To: www-style@w3.org
> fantasai: could be "for example, margin collapsing is not affected because
> [it is] based on computed values and not used values"

> glazou: is fantasai's proposal a compromise you can live with?
> arronei: I think that what fantasai proposes is fine, with 'for example'
> prefix. May need some rewording.
> * fantasai wonders if dbaron is on the call
> RESOLVED: replace the sentence with Fantasai's proposal

Did we resolve that? I thought that we resolved to do something 
/similar/ to that (that is, use "For example, margin collapsing is 
unaffected because [...]") but with a view to possible rewording the 
second half of fantasai's proposal, as per Arron's comment.

At least, I'd like to mull the full sentence over for a short while 
before committing to it.

Anton Prowse
Received on Wednesday, 4 April 2012 22:46:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:13 UTC