On 04/03/2012 03:41 PM, Glenn Adams wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 15:00, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com <mailto:glenn@skynav.com>> wrote: > > I see that the current CSS UI LCWD marks nav-* as at risk. Is this because > > there aren't two implementations? > > Yes. There might not even be one (that satisfies what the CSSWG > considers an implementation - that is, I'm not sure Opera supports > nav-* on the desktop). I don't recall us having a requirement that the implementation be available on desktop computers, only that it be publicly available. If you have to buy a device to get the implementation, that still qualifies as available. (It might not be not "free" or "convenient", but those weren't requirements.) ~fantasaiReceived on Tuesday, 3 April 2012 23:26:08 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:14 UTC