- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 16:41:39 -0600
- To: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
- Cc: W3C Style <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 3 April 2012 22:42:29 UTC
thanks (and forwarding) On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu> wrote: > (note: ok with posting this on www-style, if that's ok with you, i'd > like to forward my reply to www-style. thanks, -t) > > On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 15:00, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: > > I see that the current CSS UI LCWD marks nav-* as at risk. Is this > because > > there aren't two implementations? > > Yes. There might not even be one (that satisfies what the CSSWG > considers an implementation - that is, I'm not sure Opera supports > nav-* on the desktop). > > > Is there any movement towards satisfying > > this? > > None that I know of. There seems to be a lack of implementer interest. > > > Is there a recommended alternative approach if they will be dropped? > > They'll be added to the list of dropped CSS3-UI features being > considered for CSS4-UI: > > http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css4-ui#dropped-css3-features > > Thanks, > > Tantek > > -- > http://tantek.com/ - I made an HTML5 tutorial! http://tantek.com/html5 >
Received on Tuesday, 3 April 2012 22:42:29 UTC