- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:46:12 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 09/27/2011 10:22 AM, Tantek Çelik wrote: >fantasai wrote: >> Like, we need to cut off and ship CR at some point. :) > > There have been enough non-trivial fixes and in particular the > specification of text-overflow, and there's already been one publisher > that errantly read/cited an obsolete 2003 CSS3-Text CR for > text-overflow rather than the Editor's CSS3-UI draft. > > I'm considering calling for the publication of a LCWD with open > issues, knowing that once those are resolved, there will be (at least) > another LCWD before a CR. > > Any objections to publishing a CSS3-UI LCWD with known open issues? Well, what are the open issues? Let's work on them and get them resolved. I haven't seen them on the agenda ever: maybe all it takes is spending some WG time on them so we can knock them off the list. ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 27 September 2011 18:46:40 UTC