- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:55:02 -0700
- To: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
I'm not sure if the two of you are at all discussing the same feature. I *think* what Brian is talking about is background-clip: no-clip, which was in older-drafts of css3-background. (I'm happy it was removed.) I *think* what Tab is talking about is extending the image larger than its underlying size, which is sensible given the 'background-repeat: extend'. This requires assuming that Tab's sentence: # The effect of it is that it displays the entire image when an image # overflows the concrete object size. in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Sep/0331.html was actually the opposite of what he meant, and the proposal for background-repeat: extend (which I've never actually seen) is actually about extending the *image* when it doesn't fill the box. But I'm not sure about either statement. -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂
Received on Tuesday, 20 September 2011 22:55:29 UTC