W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2011

Re: [css3-text] comments on text-transform

From: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 02:39:02 -0700 (PDT)
To: Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@crissov.de>
Cc: W3C Style <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <214664546.11734.1315906742594.JavaMail.root@zimbra1.shared.sjc1.mozilla.com>
Christoph Päper wrote:

> > 1. Value renamings
> >
> > I think these two values should be renamed back to their previous
> > value names.
> 
> You think “fullwidth” and “full-width” are different things that
> should be distinguished by a hyphen? Even if they were, a normal
> author wouldn’t know and would constantly misspell the one or the
> other.

If they really must be the same, I would prefer to have them both be
'fullwidth', since that's the common usage in Unicode and that's
more widely used than the OpenType feature names.

> > 2. Clear indication that this property involves character
> > transformation
> >
> > … I think there needs to be clear wording that defines
> > text-transform as a character-level transform, as opposed to a glyph
> > level transform via OpenType.
> 
> I believe I’ve explained earlier this year that I don’t think this is
> necessarily so.

Sorry, but can you post a link to your original post regarding this?

Regards,

John
Received on Tuesday, 13 September 2011 09:39:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:04 UTC