W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2011

Re: [css3-text] comments on text-transform

From: Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@crissov.de>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 10:49:02 +0200
Message-Id: <7ABC3C99-F5CA-40B1-A5A7-33747CC88766@crissov.de>
To: W3C Style <www-style@w3.org>
John Daggett:
> 1. Value renamings
> I think these two values should be renamed back to their previous
> value names.

You think “fullwidth” and “full-width” are different things that should be distinguished by a hyphen? Even if they were, a normal author wouldn’t know and would constantly misspell the one or the other.

> 2. Clear indication that this property involves character transformation
> … I think there needs to be clear wording that defines text-transform as a character-level transform, as opposed to a glyph level transform via OpenType.

I believe I’ve explained earlier this year that I don’t think this is necessarily so.

> (e.g. line breaking will be different with 'fullwidth').

That’s why this value is a bad idea in the first place and shouldn’t be done in CSS.
Received on Tuesday, 13 September 2011 08:49:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:04 UTC