On Sep 10, 2011, at 6:54 AM, "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > On Fri, 9 Sep 2011, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > > > > If so, then extending or modifying "seamless" with more control over how > > styles in the outer document affect the inner document seems like the > > way to go. > > If this is a presentational desire, it may make sense to define > seamless="" in part in terms of the CSS feature. > > Maybe "seamless" should be entirely a presentational feature, and not an HTML attribute at all. It seems unusual to have a CSS property that only affects one particular HTML element.
Received on Saturday, 10 September 2011 16:37:09 UTC