- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 15:52:28 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
- cc: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>, David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>, Vincent Hardy <vhardy@adobe.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Sun, 11 Sep 2011, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > > On Fri, 9 Sep 2011, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > > > > > > If so, then extending or modifying "seamless" with more control over > > > how styles in the outer document affect the inner document seems > > > like the way to go. > > > > If this is a presentational desire, it may make sense to define > > seamless="" in part in terms of the CSS feature. > > Maybe "seamless" should be entirely a presentational feature, and not an > HTML attribute at all. I think there's definitely a semantic aspect to it: a regular iframe is conceptually a different document, whereas a seamless iframe is conceputally just a part of the parent document. So I think it makes sense to be a content attribute. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Saturday, 10 September 2011 15:54:32 UTC