On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:47 AM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote: > I think this would be useful, but we should expose point mapping in the > same way that we expose rect/quad mapping. > Sure, OK. Something like element.mapPointTo(relativeTo, x, y)? > Having a variety of functions for the content, padding and margin rects > seems like overkill; I would prefer one or two "bottleneck" quad mapping > functions with helper methods to get the various boxes for a given element. > I'm not quite sure what you mean. Can you suggest something? In addition to the split boxes issue, we also have to settle on a coordinate > system for split inlines (I believe David Baron suggested that the top left > of the first box could be considered to be the origin). > Not quite sure what you mean here either. I think my suggestion is well-defined for inlines. Rob -- "If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness. If we claim we have not sinned, we make him out to be a liar and his word is not in us." [1 John 1:8-10]
Received on Thursday, 8 September 2011 01:57:06 UTC