W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2011

Re: 2d vs 3d transform-origin

From: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:08:53 -0700
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-id: <E565CF47-CCA3-44CB-805E-4679394E33E7@me.com>
To: Jennifer Yu <Jennifer.Yu@microsoft.com>
On Oct 31, 2011, at 2:30 PM, Jennifer Yu wrote:

> Hi guys,
> It looks like the ED version of the 2D Transforms spec was updated in March 2010 to align transform-origin with background-position. This is great, except that the 3D Transforms ED had no accommodating update and now clashes with the 2D Transforms spec. For instance, is ‘transform-origin: left bottom 20px’ specifying a 2D (left, bottom 20px) or 3D (left, bottom, 20px) transform origin?

Good point. I filed <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14647>

I'm not sure how to resolve this, other than invent a new syntax for transform-origin, or to break out transform-origin-z into a separate property.


Received on Monday, 31 October 2011 23:09:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:06 UTC