- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:00:45 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 11:14 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > I was looking through Brad's comments on the radial gradient syntax, and one > of the > things that stood out was the broken expectation that moving the center > would shift > the center of the gradient while keeping the outer rim the same -- an effect > that > would create an asymmetric radial gradient, like this: > http://www.amanith.org/images/Radgrad.png > > I'm not saying we should add this capability right now, but I'm a little > concerned > that we might be locking ourselves in here. If we were to add asymmetric > radial > gradients in the future, how would that look? How would it interact with the > symmetric radial gradient syntax we have now? The original -webkit-gradient() function allowed this functionality. I think it's a useful piece of functionality, but it complicated the syntax enough that I felt it wasn't quite useful enough to justify. I plan to look at it for later. Brian's suggestion shows how the literate syntax makes it easier to understand when you're potentially throwing around three pairs of lengths. So, level 4 sounds pretty good. ~TJ
Received on Monday, 31 October 2011 17:01:34 UTC