- From: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 06:27:39 +0000
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd368149(VS.85).aspx In D2D, this is addressed with the gradientOriginOffset parameter: "In the brush's coordinate space, the offset of the gradient origin relative to the gradient ellipse's center." To support it, it would be straighforward to expand the syntax from (one proposal): radial-gradient(<size> [at <position>]?, <color-stop>[, <color-stop>]+) to (another proposal): radial-gradient(<size> [at <position> [offset <length>{2}]? ]?, <color-stop>[, <color-stop>]+) -Brian > -----Original Message----- > From: fantasai [mailto:fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net] > Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2011 11:14 PM > To: www-style@w3.org > Subject: [css3-images] asymmetric radial gradients > > I was looking through Brad's comments on the radial gradient syntax, > and one of the > things that stood out was the broken expectation that moving the center > would shift > the center of the gradient while keeping the outer rim the same -- an > effect that > would create an asymmetric radial gradient, like this: > http://www.amanith.org/images/Radgrad.png > > I'm not saying we should add this capability right now, but I'm a > little concerned > that we might be locking ourselves in here. If we were to add > asymmetric radial > gradients in the future, how would that look? How would it interact > with the > symmetric radial gradient syntax we have now? > > ~fantasai >
Received on Monday, 31 October 2011 06:30:23 UTC