- From: John Bilicki III <jabcreations@hotmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 20:36:41 +0000
- To: <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <COL102-W5424D3757EF40683E3A7BCDCE50@phx.gbl>
Hello, I don't participate regularly and HIGHLY prefer forums for this type of communication therefore I'll mention that I do not use this email address often (once every few weeks to months) so any replies to me directly should be directed through my site (look up JAB Creations). I have encountered problems with styling in Gecko/Firefox and Presto/Opera where <s><sub>text</sub></s> and <s><sup>text</sup></s>. The strike-through appears as an underline or an overline. Visually this is how I would interpret it with or without a comparison and I can't tell the difference unless I construct the examples first. As is being discussed here on the Gecko/Firefox bug report Gecko "correctly" implements the spec however it's clear the spec itself is incorrect... https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=695442 The strike through only VISUALLY appears as a strike-through if the strike is at the vertically-centered regardless of the text's own vertical positioning. To disregard human interpretation of the visual application only creates a disconnect between perception and statement. The desired and correct application of the strike-through styling is implemented in Internet Explorer 8 and Safari 5.1 on Windows XP. Here is some sample XHTML (application/xhtml+xml)... *************************** <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en"> <head> <title>Test Case</title> <style type="text/css"> p {font-size: 64px;} </style> </head> <body> <p>normal text <s><sub>sub test text</sub><sup>sup test text</sup></s> normal text</p> <p>normal text <sub style="text-decoration: overline;">sub test text</sub><sup style="text-decoration: underline;">sup test text</sup> normal text</p> </body> </html> *************************** - John Bilicki
Received on Wednesday, 19 October 2011 10:09:53 UTC