Re: [css3-images] simplifying radial gradients

I said 'linear' when I really meant 'radial' there. Maybe that's why I don't understand your answer. 

On Oct 12, 2011, at 2:27 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I don't see how. I am giving 'linear-gradient()' equal standing to 'url()'. CSS does not include ways for BMP/JPG/PNG images to be cropped, moved, and sized within 'url()', So why does radial-gradient have to have ghat?
> 
> Linear gradients have the advantage that, no matter what size and
> position you choose for the gradient-line, you can construct a
> gradient with identical appearance that has the gradient-line defined
> as the draft does (centered in the box, with endpoints placed in a
> particular way).  Radials don't have that.
> 
> ~TJ

Received on Thursday, 13 October 2011 16:55:03 UTC