- From: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:41:04 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:32:04 +0200, Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com> wrote: > On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 17:00:50 +0100, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote: > >> On Mar 15, 2011, at 2:06 pm, L. David Baron wrote: >> >>> Why does 'animation-iteration-count' accept negative values? >>> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-animations/#the-animation-iteration-count-property- >>> >>> It's more typical for CSS properties where negative values don't >>> make sense to require that negative values be a parse error, rather >>> than to require that they clamp to zero. >> >> This looks like an oversight. I'll fix. > > When this gets fixed, I think 'animation-duration' should get a similar > treatment. Hm, would need to pay attention to the 'animation' shorthand then, though. It currently says to treat the first <time> as an 'animation-duration', but in e.g. "animation: foo -1s 1s" that wouldn't be possible. -- Øyvind Stenhaug Core Norway, Opera Software ASA
Received on Thursday, 13 October 2011 13:41:50 UTC