- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 12:47:24 -0700
- To: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>, W3C style mailing list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com> wrote: > Suppose a UA implemented "random" to always evaluate to 0, except on February 29th when it evaluates to 1. > > Is that UA non-conformant? Or does it just have a "somewhat undesirable" pseudorandom number generator? Presumably a spec would have some definition of the acceptable distribution. ^_^ ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 12 October 2011 19:48:11 UTC