On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com> wrote: > [Tab Atkins Jr.:] >> >> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com> >> wrote: >> > [Anne van Kesteren:] >> >> I could update the note I just added saying it is for coordination >> >> between vendors and specifications, then remove the extensibility >> >> section from the specification, and leave the specific details up to >> >> the wiki page in question. >> >> >> >> We could then add a new section to the wiki page where we document >> >> extensions from vendors. >> >> >> >> Does that work for everyone? >> >> >> > Sure, this *can* work. But is something that's required to ensure >> > interop be a note linking to a wiki page ? >> >> Do you have a problem with the note, or the wiki page? >> > I care about implementation requirements being normative. So that would be the note, then. Anne, could you make it not a note? ~TJReceived on Wednesday, 12 October 2011 16:06:02 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:05 UTC