RE: [cssom] CSSRule extensibility

[Tab Atkins Jr.:]
> 
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
> > [Anne van Kesteren:]
> >> I could update the note I just added saying it is for coordination
> >> between vendors and specifications, then remove the extensibility
> >> section from the specification, and leave the specific details up to
> >> the wiki page in question.
> >>
> >> We could then add a new section to the wiki page where we document
> >> extensions from vendors.
> >>
> >> Does that work for everyone?
> >>
> > Sure, this *can* work. But is something that's required to ensure
> > interop be a note linking to a wiki page ?
> 
> Do you have a problem with the note, or the wiki page?
> 
I care about implementation requirements being normative.