- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 15:52:27 +0000
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- CC: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
[Boris Zbarsky:] > > On 10/3/11 11:41 AM, Sylvain Galineau wrote: > > Note that animating to/from display:none was not the original question > > (though it's also worth discussing). > > The question is: given animations applied to element E and/or its > > descendants, what is the effect of making E display:none on these > > animations ? > > OK; that's a very different question from the one I was worrying about, > which was "Can a page start an animation on an element that is > display:none or on its descendants?".... > > -Boris Actually, that is also part of the question so allow me to expand on the issues I'd like to resolve: 1. Given an animation A currently running on E, what is the effect on A of giving E display:none ? 2. Given an element E with display:none, what is the effect of applying an animation A to E ? What happens when E is given non-none display after A is applied ? Specifically, when the element is given a visible display less t seconds of the animation being applied, with t being the animation's duration ? 3. Given an animation A currently running on a descendent of E, what is the effect on A of giving E display:none ? 4. Given an element E with display:none, what is the effect of applying an animation A to a descendant of E ? What happens when E is given non-none display after A is applied? Specifically, when the element is given a visible display less than t seconds of the animation being applied, with t being the animation's duration ? Does that make sense ? And am I missing other interesting cases ? Same 4 questions for visibility but there seems to be consensus in this case that there is no difference between visibility:hidden and visibility:visible.
Received on Monday, 3 October 2011 15:52:59 UTC