- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 14:16:58 -0800
- To: Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@crissov.de>
- Cc: W3C Style <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@crissov.de> wrote: > Tab Atkins Jr.: >> A UA that doesn't care about the general web can pick and choose what >> to implement, > > I was thinking about those. > >> but we don't give any thought to them when designing CSS. > > That’s unfortunate. Shrug. The set of programs that aren't intended to browse the general web but do care about CSS is (1) large in an absolute numbers sense (2) ridiculously tiny in a comparative userbase sense, and (3) typically completely silent in the standards process. #1 means we can't practically care about all of them. #2 means we *won't* care much about them. #3 means they don't *make* us care about them. So, we don't care about them unless they're high-profile or noisy. One example of both is the ePub consortium, representing ePub readers and the ePub 3.0 standard. They represent a combined userbase within an order of magnitude of Opera, and within their domain (e-readers) hold a substantial percentage of the userbase. They've also been willing to agitate for representation, so they got some. ~TJ
Received on Monday, 21 November 2011 22:18:04 UTC