RE: Levels and modular structure from Sylvain Galineau on 2011-11-21 (www-style@w3.org from November 2011)

From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 21:14:50 +0000
To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@crissov.de>
CC: W3C Style <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <3C4041FF83E1E04A986B6DC50F017829033A53E7@TK5EX14MBXC295.redmond.corp.microsoft.>


[Tab Atkins Jr.:]
> 
> 
> Ah, yes, that explains why we're talking past each other.  Yes, modules
> are there purely to make specifying and reading easier.  

It's a lot more than for the comfort of editors and their readers afaik; it 
primarily allows for the incremental standardization and implementation of 
features. The alternative being that opacity to not be standard until Regions 
or whatever else we choose to put in Level 3 is 'done'.

Received on Monday, 21 November 2011 21:15:53 UTC