- From: Florian Rivoal <florianr@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 14:52:23 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 14:19:42 +0100, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: > On 11/21/11 7:44 AM, Florian Rivoal wrote: >> Section "8. Replaced content" says that when the content introduced by >> content: is a single url, then the element or pseudo element is a >> replaced element. > > This happens to not be compatible with what the "content" property does > in CSS 2.1, for what it's worth.... I wasn't sure if CSS 2.1 said something incompatible, or forgot to specify what should happen. Where in the 2.1 did you find something that css3-content contradicts?
Received on Monday, 21 November 2011 13:52:54 UTC