- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 00:22:18 +0000
- To: "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Saturday, 19 November 2011 00:22:51 UTC
Agreement is not necessary but, imo, not sufficient for a such a fundamental change. I would like to know why people agree. If they do not want to say why, that’s fine but I’d like that to be explicitly stated. From: rocallahan@gmail.com [mailto:rocallahan@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Robert O'Callahan Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 2:43 PM To: Sylvain Galineau Cc: www-style@w3.org Subject: Re: Unprefixing CSS properties On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com<mailto:sylvaing@microsoft.com>> wrote: And one more thing: I don't really care what any browser vendor's internal discussion concluded. If browser vendors agree on a set of properties can be unprefixed, then we should be able to go ahead regardless of whether we agree for the same reasons or not. Specifically, you probably don't just agree with Henri because his blog post is articulate, thoughtful and well argued. For what it's worth, I don't agree with everything Henri said. Rob -- "If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness. If we claim we have not sinned, we make him out to be a liar and his word is not in us." [1 John 1:8-10]
Received on Saturday, 19 November 2011 00:22:51 UTC