On 11/16/2011 01:44 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 11/17/11 10:28 AM, Brian Manthos wrote: >> I don't care whether you call them "Level 3 and Level 4" vs. "Level 27 and Level 28". The point is that some features are >> expected to (or have already) mature(d) faster than others. The 4 (or 28) module is the storage ground for "stuff being >> considered but not on the same timeline". It has that purpose, as I understand it. > > I'm not really sure it does; I fully expect "Selectors Level 4" to go to REC sooner than some "Level 3" modules. That's the expectation, yes. This is actually listed as an example in [1]. Have you read [1]? [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS/#css3 ~fantasaiReceived on Wednesday, 16 November 2011 22:50:37 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:07 UTC