- From: Jennifer Yu <Jennifer.Yu@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 22:58:20 +0000
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Thanks for the clarification. That's what I would have expected. It's also what Gecko does as David points out, though I believe Webkit doesn’t apply a transition. -----Original Message----- From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 2:53 PM To: Jennifer Yu Cc: www-style@w3.org Subject: Re: [css3-transitions] interpolation between value types On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Jennifer Yu <Jennifer.Yu@microsoft.com> wrote: > While > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-transitions/#animation-of-property-types- > describes how each property type undergoes a transition, it doesn’t > define how interpolation should occur between value types. eg. between > a percentage and a length. > > I would imagine that you’d compute a length from the percentage, then > interpolate over the lengths. But this is a little more complicated in > the case of background-position, for instance. If you have: > > { > background-image: url('1.gif'), url('2.gif'), url('3.gif'); > background-size: 100px 100px, 200px 200px, 300px > 300px; > background-position: 50%; > transition: background-position 5s; > width: 500px; > height: 500px; > } > > then set element.style.backgroundPosition=”100px”; > > What does a transition and its corresponding computed value look like > in this case? I believe the intention is to use calc() to represent the intermediate state. background-position is underdefined in this aspect. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2011 23:00:50 UTC