- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 06:07:55 +0900
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Cc: robert@ocallahan.org, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tuesday 2011-05-31 00:24 -0400, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 5/30/11 11:52 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > >I think we should alter Appendix E step 6 so that it paints the block > >children of the inline. > > I can live with that. > > I still think the behavior of 'opacity' should be clearly defined in > terms of the Appendix E painting model. I think Hixie's original draft of what became Appendix E did describe how 'opacity' worked; that bit was removed for inclusion in CSS 2.1. I wish I could remember where that document lives. -David -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2011 21:08:23 UTC