Re: [css3-color] Definition of 'opacity' makes no sense for block-inside-inline situations from Boris Zbarsky on 2011-05-31 (www-style@w3.org from May 2011)

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 00:24:55 -0400
To: robert@ocallahan.org
CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4DE46D97.7010009@mit.edu>

On 5/30/11 11:52 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> I think we should alter Appendix E step 6 so that it paints the block
> children of the inline.

I can live with that.

I still think the behavior of 'opacity' should be clearly defined in 
terms of the Appendix E painting model.

-Boris

Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2011 04:25:24 UTC