- From: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 01:45:47 +0000
- To: Vincent Hardy <vhardy@adobe.com>, W3C style mailing list <www-style@w3.org>
± From: Vincent Hardy [mailto:vhardy@adobe.com] ± Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 6:33 PM ± ± I liked the proposal you had in a previous email for the property name: ± ± Element.contentOverflow ± ± For the property values, I prefer a mix of what you propose: ± ± overflow | fit | empty ± ± I am not sure we need the 'not-a-region' value because in case of non- ± region element, we could specify that the contentOverflow value is 'fit'. I think the property really need to have "region" in the name. Otherwise it may be expected to return overflow status on regular elements, which it is not designed to do... I have mixed feelings on 'not-a-region'. It is true that regular element can always say 'fit' but it is useless and some kind of "not applicable" would make more sense... But it is still useless... Maybe Element.regionContentOverflow = overflow | fit | empty Or Element.regionOverflow = overflow | fit | empty ?
Received on Thursday, 19 May 2011 01:46:17 UTC