- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 16:52:14 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 05/18/2011 10:31 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > > In general, it's the editor's responsibility to make the choices over > the specs they edit. Especially for relatively small details like > this, it's definitely not standard practice to make it a WG issue > first. If you want to raise an issue, feel free, but the two editors > of the spec agree on this change, and we've already established in the > thread that two of the relevant implementors are fine with the change. No, actually, it's the WG's responsibility, which in straightforward and minor (or merely severely unstable), non-controversial cases is delegated to the editor. This is not a non-controversial issue, and it's relatively major-- not to implementers, for whom it's a trivial adjustment--but to authors. It is definitely something that should be taken up and resolved formally by the CSSWG. Not that I disagree with your conclusion, but this WG does not operate on the dictator-editor model, we operate by consensus in the WG. ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 18 May 2011 23:52:48 UTC