- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 11:27:31 -0700
- To: Brendan Kenny <bckenny@gmail.com>
- CC: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, Alex Danilo <alex@abbra.com>, www-style@w3.org
On 05/06/2011 11:15 AM, Brendan Kenny wrote: > To back up all the "I think"s with another, this looks correct. It > does seem a little strange to algebraically define how to linearly > interpolate the image size but then defer to Porter-Duff for addition, > though :) > > It seems like the more important phrase to be careful with is "has a > global alpha applied to it." Is this defined elsewhere? It's not a > huge leap, but it seems better to just identify this as Porter-Duff's > dissolve operator and dispel any confusion about premultiplication or > whether all components are scaled equally. I'm happy to edit in improvements to the text while Tab is away as long as - someone else tells me the *exact* edits that are desired - one of dbaron, smfr, or roc approves said edits because, as I mentioned before, I haven't a clue as to the correctness of this section. ~fantasai
Received on Friday, 6 May 2011 18:28:04 UTC