- From: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>
- Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 22:42:30 -0400
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
My best preference is not to allow omitting the second value so that authors have to think about both horizontal and vertical cases, and in which case I think ''right right' works good. If that's not the case for you or for anyone, I vote ''inter-character'' as I thought ''base'' is baseline when I heard that first. Regards, Koji -----Original Message----- From: www-style-request@w3.org [mailto:www-style-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of fantasai Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 9:05 AM To: www-style@w3.org Subject: Re: [css3-ruby] ruby-position On 05/04/2011 05:01 AM, Koji Ishii wrote: > I remember we discussed this, but I can't remember why we didn't like > 'right right'. Was that because it could be misleading when second > half was omitted? Yes, the concern Richard raised was that people writing in vertical text would choose 'right' when they really meant 'before/over/above/whatever'. > One concern for 'inter-character' and 'inter-base' is that it isn't > directional and therefore it could point to either left or right. True. Although having it on the "after" side of the base makes the most sense to me. > How about 'inter-right'? Um. That's kinda non-grammatical. :) "inter" is a prefix that means "between". It needs to be attached to something, and attaching it to "right" doesn't make any sense... ~fantasai
Received on Friday, 6 May 2011 02:42:41 UTC