- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 02:17:56 +0000
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
[fantasai:] > On 04/27/2011 10:28 AM, Stephen Zilles wrote: > > > > Here is a re-write of sections 3.3 and 3.4 along the lines that I > > understood Sylvain to be suggesting and also attempting to incorporate > > the suggestions that were made during the discussion this morning. To > > the extent possible, I tried to use the text that was already present > > and to, mostly, re-order the description to emphasize that there were > two kinds of implementations and to be clear when each type of > implementation could occur. I recognize that the English probably needs > some clean-up to improve the readability, but I wanted to get the idea on > the floor for comment. > > Thanks for the re-write, Steve. This was really helpful. :) I tried to > incorporate your ideas and some additional wordsmithing into the spec. > Take a look and let me know if you have any suggestions for improvement? > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-2010/#experimental > > ~fantasai This does look good ! Now, I thought we had agreed to release snapshots as notes ? If so, isn't this all non-normative ?
Received on Friday, 6 May 2011 02:18:27 UTC