- From: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 20:08:32 +1100
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- CC: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 17/03/2011 3:10 AM, L. David Baron wrote: [snip] > I believe your observations about implementations are correct, but > that your statement of what the spec requires is incorrect, at least > as of the latest editor's draft: > http://www.w3.org/Style/css2-updates/draft-PR-CSS21-201103XX/box.html#collapsing-margins > which says the following: > * Nonzero min-height does NOT prevent collapsing of a block's > bottom margin with the bottom margin of its last child. > * Nonzero min-height DOES prevent collapsing of a block's own top > and bottom margins, UNLESS the block's top margin collapses with > its last child's bottom margin. (The "UNLESS" bit comes from the > statement that "A collapsed margin is considered adjoining to > another margin if any of its component margins is adjoining to > that margin.") > > Also see the comments on (MC1) in > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0346.html > > > If you do not accept this resolution, please let us know by March > 18, 2011. > > -David I support this resolution. I see no benefit or use case for CSS authors with the current Gecko behavior. -- Alan http://css-class.com/ Armies Cannot Stop An Idea Whose Time Has Come. - Victor Hugo
Received on Thursday, 17 March 2011 09:09:10 UTC