- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 17:12:21 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>, David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>, "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
On Mar 16, 2011, at 4:59 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mar 16, 2011, at 1:56 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >>> 2011/3/16 Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>: >>>> How about something that said not to take the glyph size and font leading >>>> into account at all for line box height calculation, unless it us the only >>>> thing on the line and needs to be an input into line-height (for em line >>>> height, for example). Then it could also maybe solve the problem of >>>> vertical-align:sup creating a big gap between two lines. >>> >>> Nah, you want it to take the height of the large letter into account, >>> just not the nonexistent descender. >> >> You presume to know what I want? >> >> First lines are not the only lines to get messed up in spite of consistent line-heights on the whole block. > > I presume to know what *Hyatt* wants, and your solution was > insufficient for that for the reason I mentioned. > > (Also, that was a general "you", not a specific "you as in Brad". Sorry.) It was my email that you replied to and said "no" to. It was insufficient for the reason I mentioned.
Received on Thursday, 17 March 2011 00:13:03 UTC