- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 09:19:04 -0700
- To: Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
On Friday 2011-03-04 10:42 +0100, Anton Prowse wrote: > On 04/03/2011 01:06, Bert Bos wrote: > >(Issue 192 is tracked at http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-192) > > > >On Wednesday) 01 September 2010 21:19:56 Anton Prowse wrote: > >>Also, as I've pointed out before, 9.4.2 (Inline Formatting Context) > >>incorrectly says "Line boxes are stacked with no vertical separation" > >>so that needs editing too. > > > >No, that remains true, even in the presence of floats. It may look as if > >there is space between the lines, but actually the space is made up of > >empty line boxes. (The space is always an integral number times the > >'line-height'.) > > Woah, that's a completely different model to the one I have always > assumed. You're saying that empty line boxes exist, stacked one atop > the other. Yeah, I think we discussed and rejected this option (stacked line boxes) when we came up with the text in 9.5 which says explicitly: # If a shortened line box is too small to contain any further # content, then it is shifted downward until either it fits or # there are no more floats present. (And, yeah, "further content" here should probably just say "content", as I think you've pointed out.) -David -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Wednesday, 16 March 2011 16:20:04 UTC