- From: John Jansen <John.Jansen@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:56:51 +0000
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, Peter Moulder <peter.moulder@monash.edu>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Thank you for your feedback. The CSSWG has addressed your concerns in the upcoming publication of the CSS 2.1 specification[1]. The CSSWG resolved to make it more clear what "end-of-line" means in section 4.2. We hope this closes your issue. Please respond before 18 March, 2011 if you do not accept the current resolution. [1] http://w3.org/TR/CSS > -----Original Message----- > From: www-style-request@w3.org [mailto:www-style-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Boris Zbarsky > Sent: Monday, March 07, 2011 8:47 AM > To: Peter Moulder; www-style@w3.org > Subject: Re: [CSS21] WD 4.2: end-of-string vs. end-of-stylesheet > > On 3/7/11 11:21 AM, Peter Moulder wrote: > > I was considering these provisions to be an attempt to deal relatively > > gracefully with the case of a truncated file. (Boris Zbarsky seems to > > think otherwise, and really I wouldn't know, but I'll nevertheless go > > on to explain what I was thinking.) > > Fwiw, I think the most common case in which I've seen the EOF provision > take effect in real pages are in inline style where the author forgets a closing > ')' or whatnot. > > -Boris >
Received on Monday, 14 March 2011 15:57:27 UTC