- From: John Jansen <John.Jansen@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:47:24 +0000
- To: Peter Moulder <peter.moulder@monash.edu>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Thank you for your feedback. The CSSWG resolved not to make these changes to the CSS 2.1 specification[1]. We will be reevaluating this issue for errata and future versions of CSS. Please respond before 18 March, 2011 if you do not accept the current resolution. [1] http://w3.org/TR/CSS > -----Original Message----- > From: www-style-request@w3.org [mailto:www-style-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Peter Moulder > Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 9:01 AM > To: www-style@w3.org > Subject: [CSS21] WD 4.1: longest match clarification > > §4.1.1 Tokenization: > > For the "longest match", I suggest adding the example > that `red-->' parses as IDENT `red--' followed by DELIM `>', > rather than as IDENT,CDC. > (The intent of adding this example is to clarify that the "longest > match" rule applies to an earlier token even when that results > in a shorter subsequent token.) > > (Low importance change: I don't think this clarification affects > what C/C++ programmers would implement for the normal > "full parse of the whole stylesheet" case. It might affect > the implementation of searching for a particular token, for > ancillary parsing tasks as associated with scripting languages.) > > pjrm. >
Received on Monday, 14 March 2011 15:47:58 UTC