- From: John Jansen <John.Jansen@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:44:38 +0000
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
The CSSWG has addressed your concerns in the upcoming publication of the CSS 2.1 specification[1]. We hope this closes your issue. Please respond before 14 March, 2011 if you do not accept the current resolution. [1] http://w3.org/TR/CSS > -----Original Message----- > From: www-style-request@w3.org [mailto:www-style-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of fantasai > Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 1:13 PM > To: www-style@w3.org > Subject: [CSS21] @page selector grammar > > I was reviewing the page-grammar-001 test, and noticed that there's no > normative grammar for the @page rule. The test refers to Appendix G, and > asserts that white space between @page and a selector is optional; however > this is nowhere stated in the spec. > > Proposed to add after > > # An @page rule consists of the keyword "@page", followed by an optional > # page selector, followed by a block containing declarations and at-rules. > > the following: > > | Comments and white space are allowed, but optional, between the > @page > | token and the page selector and between the page selector and the > block. > > ~fantasai >
Received on Monday, 14 March 2011 15:45:11 UTC