Re: [CSS21] WG process - next steps for CSS21?

On 03/02/2011 03:22 PM, Anton Prowse wrote:
>> 204 - NEEDS PROPOSAL. I suggest we move to Errata.
> (etc)
>
> Please could the WG state what the anticipated next steps are for this spec!
> There are *lots* of issues which were raised when the spec was CR that haven't
> been filed on the issues list, and lots more which were raised before the
> deadline for comments when the spec went back to Last Call which also have not
> been filed yet (at least, not publicly filed).

I don't represent the WG in this message, but I believe the plan is to address
all open issues at the F2F next week. I plan to work on filing the remaining
issues this week/end in preparation for this starting tomorrow morning (or late
today, if I get to it).

~fantasai