On 03/02/2011 03:22 PM, Anton Prowse wrote: >> 204 - NEEDS PROPOSAL. I suggest we move to Errata. > (etc) > > Please could the WG state what the anticipated next steps are for this spec! > There are *lots* of issues which were raised when the spec was CR that haven't > been filed on the issues list, and lots more which were raised before the > deadline for comments when the spec went back to Last Call which also have not > been filed yet (at least, not publicly filed). I don't represent the WG in this message, but I believe the plan is to address all open issues at the F2F next week. I plan to work on filing the remaining issues this week/end in preparation for this starting tomorrow morning (or late today, if I get to it). ~fantasaiReceived on Wednesday, 2 March 2011 23:58:04 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:57 UTC